Key Differences
In short — Core i5-9600K outperforms Xeon E5-1620 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-9600K is 1865 days newer than Xeon E5-1620 v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-9600K - 8 vs 6 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9600K
- Performs up to 7% better in Baldur's Gate 3 than Xeon E5-1620 v2 - 119 vs 111 FPS
- Consumes up to 27% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2 - 95 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Baldur's Gate 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €192.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 65821 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Sep 10th, 2013
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Server/Workstation • Sep 10th, 2013
Single-Core
644
37.61682242990654%
Multi-Core
2356
36.42547928262214%
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2 | vs | Intel Core i5-9600K |
---|---|---|
Sep 10th, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 6 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |