Key Differences
In short — Xeon E3-1285L v4 outperforms Core i7-6900K on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E3-1285L v4 is 364 days older than Core i7-6900K.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1285L v4
- Performs up to 0% better in F1 22 than Core i7-6900K - 273 vs 272 FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Core i7-6900K - 65 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-6900K doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6900K
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1285L v4 - 16 vs 8 threads
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
FPS
272
99%
Value, €/FPS
€0.69/FPS
100%
Price, €
€188.88
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €188.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18124 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Server/Workstation • Jun 2nd, 2015
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1285L v4 | vs | Intel Core i7-6900K |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2015 | Release Date | May 31st, 2016 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Broadwell | Codename | Broadwell-E |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 140 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Intel Iris Pro P6300 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |