Key Differences
In short — Core i5-6600K outperforms Xeon E3-1285L v4 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-6600K is 30 days newer than Xeon E3-1285L v4.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1285L v4
- Consumes up to 29% less energy than Intel Core i5-6600K - 65 vs 91 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-6600K - 8 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-6600K doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-6600K
- Performs up to 1% better in Remnant II than Xeon E3-1285L v4 - 88 vs 87 FPS
Remnant II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
FPS
88
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.15/FPS
100%
Price, €
€188.88
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €188.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18669 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Jun 2nd, 2015
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1285L v4 | vs | Intel Core i5-6600K |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2015 | Release Date | Jul 2nd, 2015 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Broadwell | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 91 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel Iris Pro P6300 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |