Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 5600X outperforms Xeon E3-1285L v4 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 5600X is 1983 days newer than Xeon E3-1285L v4.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1285L v4
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 5600X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 5600X
- Performs up to 7% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Xeon E3-1285L v4 - 187 vs 174 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1285L v4 - 12 vs 8 threads
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
FPS
187
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.68/FPS
100%
Price, €
€126.65
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €126.65 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 36 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Server/Workstation • Jun 2nd, 2015
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1285L v4 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 5600X |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2015 | Release Date | Nov 5th, 2020 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Broadwell | Codename | Vermeer |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel Iris Pro P6300 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |