Key Differences
In short — Xeon E3-1280 outperforms FX-6350 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E3-1280 is 757 days older than FX-6350.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1280
- Performs up to 1% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than FX-6350 - 169 vs 168 FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than AMD FX-6350 - 95 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6350 - 8 vs 6 threads
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Xeon E3-1280
Server/Workstation • Apr 3rd, 2011
FX-6350
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1280 | vs | AMD FX-6350 |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
| Xeon E3 | Collection | FX |
| Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Vishera |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 6 |
| 3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
| 3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 125 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 19.5x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
