Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X3D outperforms Xeon E3-1280 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X3D is 3503 days newer than Xeon E3-1280 v3.
Advantages of Xeon E3-1280 v3
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D - 82 vs 120 Watts
Advantages of Ryzen 9 7950X3D
- Performs up to 29% better in Battlefield V than Xeon E3-1280 v3 - 300 vs 232 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1280 v3 - 32 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E3-1280 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
300
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.4/FPS
100%
Price, €
€719.98
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €719.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 616 minutes ago
Trending Games
Using the selected game parameters
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Jun 2nd, 2013
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E3-1280 v3 | vs | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Haswell | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.7 GHz |
82 W | TDP | 120 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |