Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 5600GT outperforms Xeon E3-1280 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 5600GT is 3872 days newer than Xeon E3-1280 v3.
Advantages of Ryzen 5 5600GT
- Performs up to 11% better in Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Xeon E3-1280 v3 - 142 vs 128 FPS
- Consumes up to 21% less energy than Intel Xeon E3-1280 v3 - 65 vs 82 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1280 v3 - 12 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E3-1280 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Xeon E3-1280 v3
Server/Workstation • Jun 2nd, 2013
Ryzen 5 5600GT
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E3-1280 v3 | vs | Ryzen 5 5600GT |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| Xeon E3 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
| Haswell | Codename | Not Available |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 6 |
| 8 | Threads | 12 |
| 3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| 4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
| 82 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
| 36.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 7 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
