Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X3D outperforms the cheaper Core i5-13400F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-13400F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X3D and the cheaper Core i5-13400F have been released at the same time.
Advantages of Ryzen 9 7950X3D
- Performs up to 13% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i5-13400F - 758 vs 672 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-13400F - 32 vs 16 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-13400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i5-13400F
- Up to 78% cheaper than Ryzen 9 7950X3D - €157.00 vs €719.98
- Up to 76% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Ryzen 9 7950X3D - €0.23 vs €0.95 per FPS
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
758
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.95/FPS
24%
Price, €
€719.98
21%
FPS Winner
Buy for €719.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 33 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
672
89%
Value, €/FPS
€0.23/FPS
100%
Price, €
€157
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €157 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 33 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen 9 7950X3D | vs | Core i5-13400F |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Ryzen 9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Raphael | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket AM5 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 10 |
32 | Threads | 16 |
4.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
5.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
120 W | TDP | Not Available |
5 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
42.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
Radeon Graphics | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |