Background
Background
Background
Background
Background

Xeon E3-1270 vs Core i3-10320

Xeon E3-1270 vs Core i3-10320: game performance, price, value, and specification comparison. Select comparison game parameters.

Key Differences

In short — Core i3-10320 outperforms Xeon E3-1270 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-10320 is 3315 days newer than Xeon E3-1270.

Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320

  • Performs up to 85% better in Diablo IV than Xeon E3-1270 - 204 vs 110 FPS
  • Consumes up to 19% less energy than Intel Xeon E3-1270 - 65 vs 80 Watts
  • Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E3-1270 doesn't have integrated graphics
This is a free version of Diablo IV.
Diablo IV

Diablo IV

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

Ultra

Intel Xeon E3-1270 Logo
Xeon E3-1270

Server/Workstation • Apr 3rd, 2011


FPS

110

53%

Value, €/FPS

Price, €

Intel Core i3-10320 Logo
Core i3-10320

Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020


FPS

204

100%

Value, €/FPS

€0.74/FPS

100%

Price, €

€151.33

100%

FPS and Value Winner

Intel Core i3-10320 (fase base: 3,80 GHZ; attacco: LGA1200; 65 Watt) Box, BX8070110320

Buy for 151.33 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 86 minutes ago

TOP 5 Games

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

Ultra

Intel Xeon E3-1270 Logo
Xeon E3-1270

Server/Workstation • Apr 3rd, 2011

Intel Core i3-10320 Logo
Core i3-10320

Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020

Geekbench 5 Benchmarks

Intel Xeon E3-1270 Logo
Xeon E3-1270

Server/Workstation • Apr 3rd, 2011


Single-Core

614

39%

Multi-Core

2085

45%

Intel Core i3-10320 Logo
Core i3-10320

Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020


Single-Core

1539

100%

Multi-Core

4626

100%

Intel Xeon E3-1270 Logo

Intel Xeon E3-1270

vs
Intel Core i3-10320 Logo

Intel Core i3-10320

Apr 3rd, 2011Release Date
Apr 30th, 2020
Xeon E3CollectionCore i3
Sandy BridgeCodenameComet Lake
Intel Socket 1155SocketIntel Socket 1200
Server
Segment
Desktop
4Cores4
8Threads8
3.4 GHzBase Clock Speed
3.8 GHz
3.8 GHzTurbo Clock Speed
4.6 GHz
80 WTDP
65 W
32 nmProcess Size
14 nm
34.0xMultiplier
38.0x
NoneIntegrated Graphics
UHD Graphics 630
NoOverclockableNo

Similar CPU Comparisons

Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.

Copyright © 2024 HowManyFPS. All rights reserved.

Have a suggestion or a business inquiry? [email protected]

Cookies Policy

As an Amazon Associate HowManyFPS earns from qualifying purchases.