Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700F outperforms Xeon E3-1265L v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-10700F is 2524 days newer than Xeon E3-1265L v3.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1265L v3
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Core i7-10700F - 45 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-10700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700F
- Performs up to 20% better in Assassin's Creed Mirage than Xeon E3-1265L v3 - 109 vs 91 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1265L v3 - 16 vs 8 threads
Assassin's Creed Mirage
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
109
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.35/FPS
100%
Price, €
€255.66
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €255.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11301 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Server/Workstation • Jun 2nd, 2013
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1265L v3 | vs | Intel Core i7-10700F |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Haswell | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |