Buy on Amazon
€50.95
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Celeron G3930 outperforms Xeon E3-1265L v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G3930 is 1695 days newer than Xeon E3-1265L v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1265L v2
- Consumes up to 12% less energy than Intel Celeron G3930 - 45 vs 51 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Performs up to 1% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Xeon E3-1265L v2 - 120 vs 119 FPS
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Celeron G3930
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
120
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.42/FPS
100%
Price, €
€50.95
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel BX80677G3930 Processore Celeron G3930, S 1151, Kaby Lake, Dual Core, 2 Thread, 2.9GHz, 2MB Cache, 1050MHz GPU, 51W, Argento
Buy for €50.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 113 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E3-1265L v2
Server/Workstation • May 14th, 2012
Celeron G3930
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1265L v2 | vs | Intel Celeron G3930 |
|---|---|---|
| May 14th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
| Xeon E3 | Collection | Celeron |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Kaby Lake |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
| 2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
| 3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
45 W | TDP | 51 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 25.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
| Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
