Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 5300G outperforms Xeon E3-1240 v5 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 3 5300G is 2003 days newer than Xeon E3-1240 v5.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 5300G
- Performs up to 16% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Xeon E3-1240 v5 - 407 vs 351 FPS
- Consumes up to 19% less energy than Intel Xeon E3-1240 v5 - 65 vs 80 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E3-1240 v5 doesn't have integrated graphics
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Xeon E3-1240 v5
Server/Workstation • Oct 19th, 2015
Ryzen 3 5300G
Desktop • Apr 13th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1240 v5 | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 5300G |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 19th, 2015 | Release Date | Apr 13th, 2021 |
| Xeon E3 | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
| Skylake | Codename | Cezanne |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
| 8 | Threads | 8 |
| 3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
| 3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
| 80 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
| 35.0x | Multiplier | 40.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 6 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
