Key Differences
In short — Xeon E3-1240 v5 outperforms Core i3-4160T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E3-1240 v5 is 455 days newer than Core i3-4160T.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1240 v5
- Performs up to 10% better in Cyberpunk 2077 than Core i3-4160T - 75 vs 68 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4160T - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4160T
- Consumes up to 56% less energy than Intel Xeon E3-1240 v5 - 35 vs 80 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E3-1240 v5 doesn't have integrated graphics
Cyberpunk 2077
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
RT Overdrive
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
RT Overdrive
Server/Workstation • Oct 19th, 2015
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1240 v5 | vs | Intel Core i3-4160T |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2015 | Release Date | Jul 21st, 2014 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Skylake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
80 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
No | Overclockable | No |