Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2920X outperforms Xeon E3-1225 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is 2740 days newer than Xeon E3-1225.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1225
- Consumes up to 47% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 95 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Performs up to 8% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Xeon E3-1225 - 183 vs 170 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1225 - 24 vs 4 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Xeon E3-1225
Server/Workstation • Apr 3rd, 2011
Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1225 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
| Xeon E3 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Colfax |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 12 |
| 4 | Threads | 24 |
| 3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| 3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 180 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
| 31.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD P3000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
