Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2620 v3 outperforms Xeon E3-1225 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2620 v3 is 1254 days newer than Xeon E3-1225.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1225
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3
- Performs up to 5% better in Sons Of The Forest than Xeon E3-1225 - 97 vs 92 FPS
- Consumes up to 11% less energy than Intel Xeon E3-1225 - 85 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1225 - 12 vs 4 threads
Sons Of The Forest
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Apr 3rd, 2011
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1225 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Haswell-E |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Server | Segment | Server |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 85 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
Intel HD P3000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |