Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 3200G outperforms Xeon E3-1225 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 3 3200G is 3017 days newer than Xeon E3-1225.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
- Performs up to 10% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Xeon E3-1225 - 101 vs 92 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Xeon E3-1225 - 65 vs 95 Watts
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E3-1225
Server/Workstation • Apr 3rd, 2011
Ryzen 3 3200G
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1225 | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 3200G |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
| Xeon E3 | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Picasso |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
| 4 | Threads | 4 |
| 3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| 3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
| 95 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
| 31.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
| Intel HD P3000 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
