Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 3200G outperforms Xeon E5-2680 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 3 3200G is 1763 days newer than Xeon E5-2680 v3.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
- Performs up to 3% better in Minecraft than Xeon E5-2680 v3 - 667 vs 650 FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 - 65 vs 120 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 3200G - 24 vs 4 threads
Minecraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 |
---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Picasso | Codename | Haswell |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
4 | Cores | 12 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 120 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
Radeon Vega 8 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |