Buy on Amazon
€151.33
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $203
Availability
MSRP in USD: $203
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10320 outperforms Xeon E3-1220 v5 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-10320 is 1655 days newer than Xeon E3-1220 v5.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Performs up to 5% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Xeon E3-1220 v5 - 134 vs 128 FPS
- Consumes up to 19% less energy than Intel Xeon E3-1220 v5 - 65 vs 80 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1220 v5 - 8 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E3-1220 v5 doesn't have integrated graphics
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Core i3-10320
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
134
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.13/FPS
100%
Price, €
€151.33
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Core i3-10320 (fase base: 3,80 GHZ; attacco: LGA1200; 65 Watt) Box, BX8070110320
Buy for €151.33 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Xeon E3-1220 v5
Server/Workstation • Oct 19th, 2015
Core i3-10320
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1220 v5 | vs | Intel Core i3-10320 |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 19th, 2015 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i3 |
| Skylake | Codename | Comet Lake |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
| 4 | Threads | 8 |
| 3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| 3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
| 80 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 30.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
