Key Differences
In short — Xeon E-2136 outperforms Celeron G3930 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E-2136 is 555 days newer than Celeron G3930.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E-2136
- Performs up to 12% better in Battlefield IV than Celeron G3930 - 422 vs 377 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 12 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Consumes up to 36% less energy than Intel Xeon E-2136 - 51 vs 80 Watts
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
377
89%
Value, €/FPS
€0.17/FPS
100%
Price, €
€63.66
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €63.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3407 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Jul 12th, 2018
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E-2136 | vs | Intel Celeron G3930 |
---|---|---|
Jul 12th, 2018 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Xeon E | Collection | Celeron |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 2 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
80 W | TDP | 51 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
UHD Graphics P630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |