Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1920X outperforms Pentium P6100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1920X is 2510 days newer than Pentium P6100.
Advantages of Intel Pentium P6100
- Consumes up to 81% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 35 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Performs up to 22% better in Dota 2 than Pentium P6100 - 195 vs 160 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium P6100 - 24 vs 2 threads
Dota 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Best Looking
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Best Looking
Mobile • Sep 26th, 2010
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium P6100 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X |
---|---|---|
Sep 26th, 2010 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Pentium | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Arrandale | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket G1 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 12 |
2 | Threads | 24 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 180 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
15.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |