Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600KF outperforms the cheaper Pentium G645T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Pentium G645T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600KF is 3117 days newer than the cheaper Pentium G645T.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G645T
- Up to 90% cheaper than Core i5-11600KF - €25.66 vs €250.1
- Up to 86% better value when playing Valorant than Core i5-11600KF - €0.04 vs €0.29 per FPS
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600KF - 35 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600KF
- Performs up to 29% better in Valorant than Pentium G645T - 873 vs 676 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G645T - 12 vs 2 threads
Valorant
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2012
FPS
676
77.43413516609394%
Value, €/FPS
€0.04/FPS
100%
Price, €
€25.66
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €25.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3819 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
873
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.29/FPS
13.793103448275865%
Price, €
€250.1
10%
FPS Winner
Buy for €250.1 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3828 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2012
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2012
Single-Core
355
16.16575591985428%
Multi-Core
606
6.959917307913173%
Intel Pentium G645T | vs | Intel Core i5-11600KF |
---|---|---|
Sep 2nd, 2012 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Pentium | Collection | Core i5 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 12 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |