Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600KF outperforms the cheaper Core i5-760 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-760 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600KF is 3894 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-760.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600KF
- Performs up to 22% better in Battlefield IV than Core i5-760 - 453 vs 371 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-760 - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-760
- Up to 89% cheaper than Core i5-11600KF - €19.99 vs €179.85
- Up to 88% better value when playing Battlefield IV than Core i5-11600KF - €0.05 vs €0.4 per FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600KF - 95 vs 125 Watts
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
453
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.4/FPS
12%
Price, €
€179.85
11%
FPS Winner
Buy for €179.85 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 18th, 2010
FPS
371
81%
Value, €/FPS
€0.05/FPS
100%
Price, €
€19.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €19.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jul 18th, 2010
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11600KF | vs | Intel Core i5-760 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jul 18th, 2010 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Lynnfield |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1156 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |