Key Differences
In short — Celeron G3900 outperforms Pentium G640 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G3900 is 1185 days newer than Pentium G640.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Performs up to 2% better in F1 22 than Pentium G640 - 256 vs 251 FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Pentium G640 - 51 vs 65 Watts
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
256
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.24/FPS
100%
Price, €
€60.9
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €60.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 129 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jun 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium G640 | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
---|---|---|
Jun 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Pentium | Collection | Celeron |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 2 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 51 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
No | Overclockable | No |