Key Differences
In short — Pentium G3460 outperforms FX-6350 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Pentium G3460 is 448 days newer than FX-6350.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G3460
- Performs up to 2% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than FX-6350 - 120 vs 118 FPS
- Consumes up to 58% less energy than AMD FX-6350 - 53 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-6350
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G3460 - 6 vs 2 threads
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Pentium G3460
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
FX-6350
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium G3460 | vs | AMD FX-6350 |
|---|---|---|
Jul 21st, 2014 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
| Pentium | Collection | FX |
| Haswell | Codename | Vishera |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 6 |
| 2 | Threads | 6 |
| 3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
53 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 19.5x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
