Key Differences
In short — Celeron G6900 outperforms Pentium G3220 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G6900 is 3047 days newer than Pentium G3220.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Performs up to 4% better in Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order than Pentium G3220 - 219 vs 211 FPS
Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
219
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.36/FPS
100%
Price, €
€78.7
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €78.7 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 179 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium G3220 | vs | Intel Celeron G6900 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Pentium | Collection | Celeron |
Haswell | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 2 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
53 W | TDP | Not Available |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 710 |
No | Overclockable | No |