Key Differences
In short — Celeron G6900 outperforms Pentium 3825U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G6900 is 2501 days newer than Pentium 3825U.
Advantages of Intel Pentium 3825U
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Performs up to 8% better in Battlefield 1 than Pentium 3825U - 245 vs 227 FPS
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
245
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.32/FPS
100%
Price, €
€78.7
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €78.7 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 150 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Mar 1st, 2015
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium 3825U | vs | Intel Celeron G6900 |
---|---|---|
Mar 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Pentium | Collection | Celeron |
Broadwell-U | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel BGA 1168 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
1.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
15 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 710 |
No | Overclockable | No |