Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9940X outperforms Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-9940X is 2146 days newer than Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9940X
- Performs up to 17% better in Horizon Zero Dawn than Celeron G1610 - 176 vs 151 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 28 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Consumes up to 67% less energy than Intel Core i9-9940X - 55 vs 165 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-9940X doesn't have integrated graphics
Horizon Zero Dawn
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultimate
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
151
85%
Value, €/FPS
€0.59/FPS
100%
Price, €
€88.88
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €88.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17985 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultimate
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-9940X | vs | Intel Celeron G1610 |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
Core i9 | Collection | Celeron |
Skylake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
14 | Cores | 2 |
28 | Threads | 2 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
165 W | TDP | 55 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
Yes | Overclockable | No |