Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900F outperforms Core i5-10400 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-14900F is 1348 days newer than Core i5-10400.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900F
- Performs up to 44% better in Starfield than Core i5-10400 - 85 vs 59 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-10400 - 32 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-14900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
59
69%
Value, €/FPS
€2.36/FPS
100%
Price, €
€138.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €138.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 159 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-14900F | vs | Intel Core i5-10400 |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2024 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 6 |
32 | Threads | 12 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
5.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |