Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900F outperforms Core i3-10105 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-14900F is 1028 days newer than Core i3-10105.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900F
- Performs up to 3% better in Tom Clancy’s The Division 2 than Core i3-10105 - 241 vs 235 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10105 - 32 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-14900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Tom Clancy’s The Division 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
235
97%
Value, €/FPS
€0.47/FPS
100%
Price, €
€111.41
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €111.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 307 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-14900F | vs | Intel Core i3-10105 |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2024 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i3 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 4 |
32 | Threads | 8 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
5.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |