Buy on Amazon
€159.18
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $524
Availability
MSRP in USD: $524
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900F outperforms Core i3-10320 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-14900F is 1348 days newer than Core i3-10320.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900F
- Performs up to 21% better in Alan Wake 2 than Core i3-10320 - 139 vs 115 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10320 - 32 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-14900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Alan Wake 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Core i3-10320
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
115
82.73381294964028%
Value, €/FPS
€1.38/FPS
100%
Price, €
€159.18
100%
Value Winner
Intel Core i3-10320 (fase base: 3,80 GHZ; attacco: LGA1200; 65 Watt) Box, BX8070110320
Buy for €159.18 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 296 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Core i9-14900F
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Core i3-10320
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-10320
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Single-Core
1539
50.96026490066225%
Multi-Core
4626
25.320197044334975%
Intel Core i9-14900F | vs | Intel Core i3-10320 |
|---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2024 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| Core i9 | Collection | Core i3 |
| Raptor Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
| Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 4 |
32 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
5.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
| Not Available | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 20.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
