Buy on Amazon
€606.99
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $699
Availability
MSRP in USD: $699
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KS outperforms the cheaper Core i5-7400 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-7400 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900KS is 2200 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-7400.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KS
- Performs up to 31% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i5-7400 - 166 vs 127 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-7400 - 32 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7400
- Up to 67% cheaper than Core i9-13900KS - €198.6 vs €606.99
- Up to 57% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i9-13900KS - €1.56 vs €3.66 per FPS
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KS - 65 vs 150 Watts
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Core i9-13900KS
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
FPS
166
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3.66/FPS
42%
Price, €
€606.99
32%
FPS Winner
Procesorius Intel CPU CORE I9-13900KS S1700 BOX/6.0G BX8071513900KS S RMBX IN
Buy for €606.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 54 minutes ago
Core i5-7400
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
127
76%
Value, €/FPS
€1.56/FPS
100%
Price, €
€198.6
100%
Value Winner
Intel BX80677I57400 - Processore Core i5-7400 3GHz 6MB Smart Cache Box (BX80677I57400)
Buy for €198.6 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 55 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Core i9-13900KS
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
Core i5-7400
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-13900KS | vs | Intel Core i5-7400 |
|---|---|---|
Jan 12th, 2023 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
| Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Raptor Lake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
| Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 4 |
32 | Threads | 4 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
6.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| 150 W | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
| UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | HD 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
