Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-7400 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-7400 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 2192 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-7400.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7400
- Up to 62% cheaper than Core i9-13900F - €202.91 vs €532.71
- Up to 54% better value when playing A Plague Tale: Requiem than Core i9-13900F - €1.59 vs €3.48 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-13900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 20% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Core i5-7400 - 153 vs 128 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-7400 - 32 vs 4 threads
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
128
83%
Value, €/FPS
€1.59/FPS
100%
Price, €
€202.91
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €202.91 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 68 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
153
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3.48/FPS
45%
Price, €
€532.71
38%
FPS Winner
Buy for €532.71 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-7400 | vs | Intel Core i9-13900F |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |