Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KS outperforms the cheaper Core i5-10400F on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900KS is 987 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-10400F.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KS
- Performs up to 11% better in Dead Space than Core i5-10400F - 169 vs 152 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-10400F - 32 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-10400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400F
- Up to 71% cheaper than Core i9-13900KS - €200.0 vs €686.0
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KS - 65 vs 150 Watts
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €686 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 347 minutes ago
Buy for €200 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 343 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Single-Core
1438
46.312399355877616%
Multi-Core
5751
26.34086016580406%
Intel Core i9-13900KS | vs | Intel Core i5-10400F |
---|---|---|
Jan 12th, 2023 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 6 |
32 | Threads | 12 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
6.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
150 W | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |