Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10400F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-7820X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-7820X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-10400F is 1039 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-7820X.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400F
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Core i7-7820X - 65 vs 140 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-7820X
- Up to 9% cheaper than Core i5-10400F - €129.0 vs €141.58
- Up to 9% better value when playing Control than Core i5-10400F - €0.64 vs €0.7 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-10400F - 16 vs 12 threads
Control
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for €141.58 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17581 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 26th, 2017
FPS
202
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.64/FPS
100%
Price, €
€129
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €129 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17581 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jun 26th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-10400F | vs | Intel Core i7-7820X |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jun 26th, 2017 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Skylake-E/EP |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 16 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 140 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |