Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KS outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1900X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900KS is 1960 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1900X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KS
- Performs up to 26% better in FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 304 vs 242 FPS
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 150 vs 180 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 32 vs 16 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Up to 38% cheaper than Core i9-13900KS - €379.64 vs €607.99
- Up to 21% better value when playing FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker than Core i9-13900KS - €1.57 vs €2.0 per FPS
FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Buy for €607.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 279 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
242
79%
Value, €/FPS
€1.57/FPS
100%
Price, €
€379.64
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €379.64 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 280 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-13900KS | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
---|---|---|
Jan 12th, 2023 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 8 |
32 | Threads | 16 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
6.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
150 W | TDP | 180 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |