Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KF outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900KF is 2583 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KF
- Performs up to 31% better in Remnant II than Celeron G3900 - 105 vs 80 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 32 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 87% cheaper than Core i9-13900KF - €60.9 vs €456.1
- Consumes up to 59% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KF - 51 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-13900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Remnant II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €456.1 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 275 minutes ago
Buy for €60.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 274 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Single-Core
581
19.542549613185333%
Multi-Core
992
4.935077856823043%
Intel Core i9-13900KF | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Core i9 | Collection | Celeron |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 2 |
32 | Threads | 2 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
5.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | 51 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |