Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-13400F on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900F and the cheaper Core i5-13400F have been released at the same time.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 5% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i5-13400F - 216 vs 206 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-13400F - 32 vs 16 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13400F
- Up to 55% cheaper than Core i9-13900F - €174.0 vs €386.0
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for €386 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 65401 minutes ago
Buy for €174 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 65401 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Single-Core
2290
83.88278388278388%
Multi-Core
10745
62.401997793135486%
Intel Core i9-13900F | vs | Intel Core i5-13400F |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 10 |
32 | Threads | 16 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
5.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | Not Available |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |