Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-14100F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-14100F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 369 days older than the cheaper Core i3-14100F.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 3% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i3-14100F - 158 vs 153 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-14100F - 32 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-14100F
- Up to 68% cheaper than Core i9-13900F - €184.99 vs €583.0
- Up to 67% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i9-13900F - €1.21 vs €3.69 per FPS
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Buy for €583 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 258 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
153
96%
Value, €/FPS
€1.21/FPS
100%
Price, €
€184.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €184.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 258 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-13900F | vs | Intel Core i3-14100F |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i3 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 4 |
32 | Threads | 8 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
5.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | Not Available |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |