Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-14100F outperforms the more expensive Core i9-10900 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-14100F is 1348 days newer than the more expensive Core i9-10900.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-14100F
- Performs up to 14% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Core i9-10900 - 153 vs 134 FPS
- Up to 64% cheaper than Core i9-10900 - €164.4 vs €460.46
- Up to 69% better value when playing Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Core i9-10900 - €1.07 vs €3.44 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-14100F - 20 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-14100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
153
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.07/FPS
100%
Price, €
€164.4
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €164.4 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 260 minutes ago
Buy for €460.46 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 261 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-14100F | vs | Intel Core i9-10900 |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2024 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 20 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |