Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900KF outperforms the cheaper Core i3-4130T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-4130T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-12900KF is 2986 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-4130T.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900KF
- Performs up to 26% better in Battlefield V than Core i3-4130T - 279 vs 222 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4130T - 24 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4130T
- Up to 92% cheaper than Core i9-12900KF - €30.28 vs €372.68
- Up to 90% better value when playing Battlefield V than Core i9-12900KF - €0.14 vs €1.34 per FPS
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than Intel Core i9-12900KF - 35 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-12900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
279
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.34/FPS
10%
Price, €
€372.68
8%
FPS Winner
Buy for €372.68 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
FPS
222
79%
Value, €/FPS
€0.14/FPS
100%
Price, €
€30.28
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €30.28 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-12900KF | vs | Intel Core i3-4130T |
---|---|---|
Nov 4th, 2021 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2013 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i3 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 2 |
24 | Threads | 4 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | 35 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |