Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-3820 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-3820 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-12900F is 3613 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-3820.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900F
- Performs up to 67% better in Starfield than Core i7-3820 - 77 vs 46 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3820 - 24 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3820
- Up to 89% cheaper than Core i9-12900F - €49.99 vs €444.0
- Up to 81% better value when playing Starfield than Core i9-12900F - €1.09 vs €5.77 per FPS
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €444 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 407 minutes ago
Desktop • Feb 13th, 2012
FPS
46
59%
Value, €/FPS
€1.09/FPS
100%
Price, €
€49.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €49.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 407 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Feb 13th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-12900F | vs | Intel Core i7-3820 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Feb 13th, 2012 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i7 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Sandy Bridge E |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 4 |
24 | Threads | 8 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
5.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 130 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |