Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900K outperforms the cheaper Core i5-4690S on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-4690S is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900K is 2191 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-4690S.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900K
- Performs up to 1% better in Control than Core i5-4690S - 203 vs 201 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4690S - 20 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4690S
- Up to 85% cheaper than Core i9-10900K - €70.78 vs €476.59
- Up to 85% better value when playing Control than Core i9-10900K - €0.35 vs €2.35 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900K - 65 vs 125 Watts
Control
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
203
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.35/FPS
14%
Price, €
€476.59
14%
FPS Winner
Buy for €476.59 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 214 minutes ago
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
201
99%
Value, €/FPS
€0.35/FPS
100%
Price, €
€70.78
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €70.78 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 440 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10900K | vs | Intel Core i5-4690S |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 4 |
20 | Threads | 4 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |