Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X3D outperforms the cheaper Core i5-4690S on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-4690S is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X3D is 3170 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-4690S.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4690S
- Up to 87% cheaper than Ryzen 9 7950X3D - €70.78 vs €550.43
- Up to 85% better value when playing Death Stranding than Ryzen 9 7950X3D - €0.32 vs €2.2 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D - 65 vs 120 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D
- Performs up to 13% better in Death Stranding than Core i5-4690S - 250 vs 222 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4690S - 32 vs 4 threads
Death Stranding
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
222
88%
Value, €/FPS
€0.32/FPS
100%
Price, €
€70.78
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €70.78 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 56 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
250
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.2/FPS
14%
Price, €
€550.43
12%
FPS Winner
Buy for €550.43 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 56 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-4690S | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Haswell | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.7 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 120 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |