Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900K outperforms the cheaper Core i9-10900F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i9-10900F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900K is 1265 days newer than the cheaper Core i9-10900F.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Up to 52% cheaper than Core i9-14900K - €288.88 vs €603.67
- Up to 49% better value when playing Resident Evil Village than Core i9-14900K - €0.95 vs €1.86 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900K
- Performs up to 7% better in Resident Evil Village than Core i9-10900F - 325 vs 304 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-10900F - 32 vs 20 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Resident Evil Village
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
304
93%
Value, €/FPS
€0.95/FPS
100%
Price, €
€288.88
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €288.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 170 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
325
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.86/FPS
51%
Price, €
€603.67
47%
FPS Winner
Buy for €603.67 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 169 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10900F | vs | Intel Core i9-14900K |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i9 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 24 |
20 | Threads | 32 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |