Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X3D outperforms the cheaper Core i9-10900F on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X3D is 979 days newer than the cheaper Core i9-10900F.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Up to 58% cheaper than Ryzen 9 7950X3D - €272.66 vs €650.68
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D - 65 vs 120 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D
- Performs up to 8% better in Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order than Core i9-10900F - 236 vs 219 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-10900F - 32 vs 20 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Buy for €272.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 344 minutes ago
Buy for €650.68 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Single-Core
1676
57.436600411240576%
Multi-Core
8426
42.917536800285234%
Intel Core i9-10900F | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 16 |
20 | Threads | 32 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.7 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 120 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |