Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms the cheaper FX-9590 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-9590 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900F is 2515 days newer than the cheaper FX-9590.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 7% better in Fortnite than FX-9590 - 230 vs 214 FPS
- Consumes up to 70% less energy than AMD FX-9590 - 65 vs 220 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-9590 - 20 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-9590
- Up to 40% cheaper than Core i9-10900F - €163.64 vs €272.66
- Up to 36% better value when playing Fortnite than Core i9-10900F - €0.76 vs €1.19 per FPS
Fortnite
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
230
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.19/FPS
63.8655462184874%
Price, €
€272.66
60%
FPS Winner
Buy for €272.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
FPS
214
93.04347826086956%
Value, €/FPS
€0.76/FPS
100%
Price, €
€163.64
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €163.64 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10900F | vs | AMD FX-9590 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jun 11th, 2013 |
Core i9 | Collection | FX |
Comet Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 8 |
20 | Threads | 8 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 220 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 23.5x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |