Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-10900F outperforms the more expensive Core i7-7820X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-10900F is 1039 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-7820X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 1% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i7-7820X - 161 vs 159 FPS
- Up to 59% cheaper than Core i7-7820X - €288.88 vs €703.9
- Up to 60% better value when playing Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i7-7820X - €1.79 vs €4.43 per FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Core i7-7820X - 65 vs 140 Watts
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
161
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.79/FPS
100%
Price, €
€288.88
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €288.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 216 minutes ago
Buy for €703.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 216 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jun 26th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10900F | vs | Intel Core i7-7820X |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jun 26th, 2017 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i7 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Skylake-E/EP |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 8 |
20 | Threads | 16 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 140 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |