Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900F outperforms the cheaper Core i9-10900F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i9-10900F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-12900F is 614 days newer than the cheaper Core i9-10900F.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Up to 35% cheaper than Core i9-12900F - €288.88 vs €444.0
- Up to 27% better value when playing Alan Wake 2 than Core i9-12900F - €2.47 vs €3.39 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900F
- Performs up to 12% better in Alan Wake 2 than Core i9-10900F - 131 vs 117 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-10900F - 24 vs 20 threads
Alan Wake 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
117
89%
Value, €/FPS
€2.47/FPS
100%
Price, €
€288.88
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €288.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 123 minutes ago
Buy for €444 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 122 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10900F | vs | Intel Core i9-12900F |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i9 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 16 |
20 | Threads | 24 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |