Buy on Amazon
€72.66
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-9800X outperforms Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-9800X is 2146 days newer than Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9800X
- Performs up to 7% better in Fortnite than Celeron G1610 - 226 vs 212 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 16 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Consumes up to 67% less energy than Intel Core i7-9800X - 55 vs 165 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-9800X doesn't have integrated graphics
Fortnite
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
212
93.80530973451327%
Value, €/FPS
€0.34/FPS
100%
Price, €
€72.66
100%
Value Winner
Intel Celeron G1610
Buy for €72.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 770 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Core i7-9800X
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
426
31.140350877192986%
Multi-Core
739
10.05031959744322%
Intel Core i7-9800X | vs | Intel Celeron G1610 |
|---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Celeron |
| Skylake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 2 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
| 4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 165 W | TDP | 55 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
