Buy on Amazon
€268.88
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $333
Availability
MSRP in USD: $333
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-9700F outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-9700F is 1330 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9700F
- Performs up to 8% better in Apex Legends than Celeron G3900 - 281 vs 259 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 77% cheaper than Core i7-9700F - €60.9 vs €268.88
- Up to 75% better value when playing Apex Legends than Core i7-9700F - €0.24 vs €0.96 per FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Core i7-9700F - 51 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-9700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Apex Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Core i7-9700F
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
281
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.96/FPS
25%
Price, €
€268.88
22%
FPS Winner
Intel Core i7-9700F - Processore desktop 8 Core fino a 4,7 GHz senza processore grafico LGA1151 300 Series 65W
Buy for €268.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 170 minutes ago
Celeron G3900
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
259
92%
Value, €/FPS
€0.24/FPS
100%
Price, €
€60.9
100%
Value Winner
Intel Celeron g3900 2,80 gHz LGA1151 2 MB Cache Tray
Buy for €60.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 169 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Core i7-9700F
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Celeron G3900
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-9700F | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
|---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Celeron |
| Coffee Lake | Codename | Skylake |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| 4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 65 W | TDP | 51 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
